The results showed that the Raster Design toolset provided up to 48%* overall productivity gain compared with basic AutoCAD, when these tasks were performed by an experienced AutoCAD user. Similarly, Autodesk also designed a productivity study for the Raster Design toolset. But, keep in mind, this is just scratching the surface of what you can do in the Architecture toolset. You can read about each of these example tasks in-depth within the study. In the chart below, you can see the type of tasks and how much easier it is to accomplish them with the Architecture toolset. The same tasks were completed up to 61%* faster on average using the Architecture toolset (depending on user expertise level with the Architecture toolset software and based on experience and training). Starting off, a new productivity study designed by Autodesk and commissioned to an independent consultant explores nine common design challenges and shows direct comparisons of the time and effort required to accomplish each specific task with basic AutoCAD and AutoCAD with the Architecture toolset.
Let’s take a look at three of these toolsets: Architecture, Raster Design, and MEP. How much time do they save, and how exactly do they do that? Good questions. With every subscription to AutoCAD, you get access to industry-specific specialized toolsets that allow you to be more productive and save time.
0 kommentar(er)
